- Three were very good.
- One was mediocre, but appropriate.
- One had no reference list at all.
- One had a reference list but no indication that most of the text was copied verbatim from the sources on that list.
- One listed 3 textbooks as references, despite instructions stating "Do not use textbooks as references."
- One had most of the references mostly right.
- One had more footnotes than references.
All about my inane ideas
About Me
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Man. Of the several term papers I have received from students this week:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
- December (1)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- July (1)
- February (6)
- January (1)
- December (2)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (1)
- April (2)
- March (1)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- October (4)
- September (10)
- August (4)
- July (1)
- June (1)
- April (1)
- March (3)
- February (1)
- December (5)
- November (4)
- October (2)
- September (4)
- August (2)
- July (1)
- June (5)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (4)
- February (3)
- January (3)
- December (6)
- November (4)
- October (3)
- September (4)
- August (4)
- July (5)
- June (1)
- May (8)
- April (3)
- March (5)
- February (10)
- January (8)
- December (9)
- November (14)
- October (5)
- September (15)
- August (11)
- July (10)
- June (20)
- May (15)
- April (12)
- March (17)
- February (9)
- January (12)
- December (15)
- November (2)
7. Having footnotes more than references: is that bad? I can imagine a situation where that is appropriate. Heck. I know of at least one prominent author who consistently has more of the footnotes than references...
ReplyDeleteScientific journals have somewhat different standards than literary publishing. Believe me, I love the footnotes of which You speak. In APA style, however, footnotes should be kept to a minimum.
ReplyDelete